Term events attended through June 30, 2026.
← All councillor filesAll reported events81 of 100 Council meetings only36 of 48 Motions moved76 total Questions, kept by year2023: 5 · 2024: 28+ · 2025: 69 · 2026: 33+ Full term comparison and caveats → 2024 · all reported39/44 · 89% 2025 · all reported25/34 · 74% 2026 through June 30 · all reported17/22 · 77% 2024 · council only18/23 · 78% 2025 · council only12/17 · 71% 2026 through June 30 · council only6/8 · 75% Open this member’s statements →
COUNCILLOR FILE
Romeyn Stevenson
Councillor
81%term attendance · all reported
Term council meetings attended through June 30, 2026.
37 in 2025 · 39 in 2026 through August 25. 59 classified substantive across both years.
2023, 2024 and 2025 use audited written minutes. The 2024 plus sign remains until audio is checked. The 2026 floor uses 23 minute sets plus five complete audio audits through August 25.
CURRENT TERM · COMPARABLE THROUGH JUNE 30, 2026
One formula used across the Site
Estimated council pay$62,500
÷Reported events attended81
=Estimated pay per attendance$772
Same cutoff and records as the Attendance page: January 2024 through June 2026. This is not verified payroll and it is not a performance grade. The archive begins November 14, 2023, but a comparable 2023 quarterly attendance grid has not yet been indexed.
BREAKDOWN BEHIND THE TERM TOTAL
Attendance by year and quarter
The headline above combines these same City reports. These smaller periods explain the total; they are not competing scores.
PresentAbsentNot eligible / not reported
City quarterly attendance grids.
City quarterly attendance grids.
City Q1 and Q2 attendance grids.
SELECTED EXAMPLES · NOT A TOTAL
Reaching Home
Moved renewal of a federal agreement worth $3,068,622 per year for two years.
Official record ↗Committee model
Moved the change making Governance and Priorities a Committee of the Whole.
Official record ↗Finance replacement
Asked which financial system was being considered and how it would be selected.
Official record ↗Family-sized housing
Asked how many three- and four-bedroom homes would be lost in the Astro Hill redevelopment.
Official record ↗Housing infrastructure
Asked separately whether drainage would be retained and whether a sidewalk would actually be built beside the 116-unit development.
Official record ↗2026 FULL-AUDIO QUESTION LEDGER · COMPLETED RECORDINGS
16timestamped questions or substantive requests found in the completed recordings
When would the development-permit application come to council if the zoning amendment advanced?
- Answer on record
- Planning said the developer would submit after second reading and the application would return as soon as it was ready; third reading would wait for development-permit approval or conditional approval.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
Why was the higher-density rezoning being tied to the proposed building?
- Answer on record
- Planning said the rezoning was not technically tied to the exact building, while the by-law text required approval of the proposed development permit before third reading.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
What staff-requested revisions had the developer made to the 36-unit apartment proposal?
- Answer on record
- Planning identified grading and drainage changes around a retaining wall, confirmation of exterior materials and more detailed servicing and access-vault plans.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
Why were no three-bedroom units included, and had that been discussed with the developer?
- Answer on record
- Planning said there had been extensive pre-application consultation, but the developer submitted only one- and two-bedroom units and staff could not state why three-bedroom units were excluded.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
Would the sidewalk run the full length of the lot?
- Answer on record
- Planning confirmed the developer was responsible for the full cost of the sidewalk along the entire Fred Coman Street frontage.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
Is the City still aiming to replace these land-use permits with leases?
- Answer on record
- Planning said the answer depends on remediation and land ownership; a future quarry by-law or policy could allow quarry permits and extraction royalties to replace stockpiling-based land-use permits.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
Would all assets at the Iqaluit Ski Association's current location be moved to the new site?
- Answer on record
- Planning said the nine-month extension allows the existing area to be cleared, but the new site's development permit had not been filed, so staff could confirm only that some items would move.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
Would the paved drainage swale beside the 116-unit development be maintained?
- Answer on record
- The response focused on road widening and sidewalk space; Stevenson later emphasized that both drainage and the sidewalk mattered.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
Was space reserved for a sidewalk and would a sidewalk actually be constructed?
- Answer on record
- Planning said the road dedication created sidewalk space; the developer confirmed construction along the full property line.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
Which financial system is the City considering, and what process will select it?
- Answer on record
- Finance said selection work was still early; a consultant or University of Waterloo students might assist, with initial budget provision planned.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
What is being done to collect the City's long-standing or bad tax debt?
- Answer on record
- Finance distinguished historic arrears from current collections and cited recent collection rates around 95–98 per cent.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
Is earlier council direction to resolve historic debts still receiving attention?
- Answer on record
- Administration said the older files were being pursued with the CFO, Planning and City legal counsel.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
How many three- or four-bedroom units are in the two Creekside Village buildings proposed for replacement?
- Answer on record
- The developer said all 20 existing units were three- or four-bedroom homes.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
What discussions occurred with Planning about the two new buildings having no three- or four-bedroom units?
- Answer on record
- The developer cited recent applicant demand, cost and the broader Astro Hill unit mix; Stevenson said he could not support the proposal.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
After those 20 homes are removed, how many three- and four-bedroom units remain in the Astro Hill portfolio?
- Answer on record
- The developer estimated 52, or about 10 per cent of its units.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
Is the earlier direction to seek an immediate territorial-law change for remote in-camera participation still clear?
- Answer on record
- Administration acknowledged the clarification; the motion then before committee concerned electronic document delivery, not remote participation.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
This ledger contains only completed full-audio audits. It does not treat unaudited recordings as silence, and it remains separate from the complete 2025 written-question ledger.
2023 TERM-START WRITTEN QUESTIONS
5attributed substantive questions from November 14 through December 12
What process would apply if approved on-the-land programming changed or the organization ceased operating?
- Answer recorded
- Planning described permit and lease controls and council's continuing authority over the land.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What were the other three Sijjanga Exception Zones?
- Answer recorded
- Planning identified the other exception areas in the zoning framework.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Was future development considered in the infrastructure cost-sharing proposal?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the model was intended to distribute eligible infrastructure costs among benefiting developments.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Were developers consulted on the draft cost-sharing by-law?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said consultation had occurred and further engagement was directed before council consideration.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Could staff provide written recommendations on proposed Planning Act amendments?
- Answer recorded
- Staff agreed the recommendations could be brought forward for council review.
- Result or follow-up
- A written staff recommendation was requested for a later council review.
Six additional November 21 questions were recorded without a speaker's name. They appear in the meeting and year totals but are not assigned to any profile.
2024 WRITTEN-RECORD QUESTION FLOOR
28+substantive questions or requests attributed in all located 2024 written minutes
Councillor Stevenson asked whether the $90,000 increase for business travel and education was for an additional councillor to attend the Federation of Canadian Municipalities conference and trade show.
- Answer recorded
- Steve England, Chief Administrative Officer, said the increase gave Council the option to send an additional councillor to the conference.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the explanation; no separate later result is identified here.
Councillor Stevenson asked for an explanation of the reduction in aquatic-centre revenues from 2022 shown in Schedule 11.
- Answer recorded
- Cameron Tumilty, Director of Corporate Services, said he would review the revenues and provide an update to Council.
- Result or follow-up
- A staff update was promised; no later result is identified in this written-record pass.
He asked for an explanation of how disposal of lots would amalgamate the ATCO Loop lots.
- Answer recorded
- Mathew Dodds, Director of Planning and Development, explained that disposal of the two ATCO Loop lots was part of the process. The next step would be to resurvey and establish a Memorandum of Understanding with the Nunavut Housing Corporation (NHC), who currently occupy two of the ATCO Loop lots.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Councillor Stevenson indicated that the City had already held a Councillor Orientation, which included some of the items, and asked if it was necessary to participate.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. England advised that staff could advise Community and Government Services of the items already covered, so that the session would only cover the items not previously provided by the City.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Councillor Stevenson asked if staff had a list of criteria that was used to determine when developments were presented to the Committee, even though they had delegated authority to approve the development.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds advised that there were some unique situations when proposed developments are presented to the Committee.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Councillor Stevenson asked if the Iqaluit Hockey League made a presentation to the Recreation Committee regarding the letter of support for the beer garden.
- Answer recorded
- Deputy Mayor Smith advised that a presentation was not made as the Recreation Committee would not meet again until March.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Councillor Stevenson asked various clarification questions relating to the Site Access Plan.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Hanson provided an explanation and advised that requirements had been met for a private drive aisle for vehicular and fire department traffic.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Councillor Stevenson asked about maintaining the walking path during the winter months, not only on the developer’s property but past the property line to the high school.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Hanson advised that the walking trail would be created during construction and would be maintained by the Astro Hill maintenance team. The team would maintain the trail during the winter months and snow would be removed off site or piled in the area noted on the Site Plan.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Councillor Stevenson asked for clarification regarding Mr.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds clarified that he referred to the development using an approachable colour palette and appealing design. He advised that the Core Area design guidelines were used for the proposed development, and staff used their understanding of what makes a building approachable and what colours were acceptable.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Councillor Stevenson asked if the proposed development was included in the Nunastar Master Plan that was presented to Council.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Hanson advised that development of the property was following the Master Plan. He noted that the proposed development was included in the Master Plan, but the exterior design had been changed slightly. He indicated that there were some minor changes to the Master Plan because of tenants like Canada Post.
- Result or follow-up
- Check later records for a result.
He asked if the project could move forward if the requirement for a Traffic Study was added to the Special Conditions.
- Answer recorded
- Councillor Sheppard pointed out that the City had the authority to request a Traffic Study in relation to the entrance of a property from the main road. He asked if the City had authority to request a Traffic Study on a property.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Councillor Stevenson asked where the money would come from to establish the Outdoor Sports Park Reserve Fund.
- Answer recorded
- Steve England, Chief Administrative Officer, said the item could be included in budget amendments expected at the end of May, when Council could discuss and adjust the amount.
- Result or follow-up
- Council removed the proposed $500,000 figure from the motion so the amount could be considered during the budget-amendment process.
Councillor Stevenson asked why it was necessary to request Council’s permission to use the turf.
- Answer recorded
- Rod Mugford, Acting Chief Administrative Officer, explained that the policy required Council’s support to use the turf.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Councillor Stevenson asked if the Government of Nunavut was consulted, as they are the largest employer in Iqaluit.
- Answer recorded
- Rod Mugford, Acting Chief Administrative Officer, advised that the Government of Nunavut was not consulted. He further advised that declaring a civic holiday required a by-law.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Councillor Stevenson inquired about the hours that the first floor would be staffed.
- Answer recorded
- Ms. McCorriston advised that the first floor would be staffed during the day and with a superintendent during the evening. As well, there would be security staff rotating between all of the sites.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Councillor Stevenson requested clarification regarding the MOU in relation to the Club not accepting a proposed location because it did not have piped services and was not free of charge, and therefore would remain at the current location.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds explained that the 18-month term would be used to find a suitable location for both parties and Council can include additional terms in the MOU.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
He asked if staff had considered alternate locations for the Club and the possible uses of the existing location if the Club was not there.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds advised that a meeting was held with the Club to determine needs and identify opportunities in order to develop the MOU. He noted that the MOU would have to be executed before staff commits time to identify a parcel of land that is acceptable to both parties. He did point out that in the past, some areas were identified as possible locations, which are still a consideration, along with exploring new locations to present to Council.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Councillor Stevenson asked for clarification about the unfunded Phase 3 Environmental Site Assessment.
- Answer recorded
- Samantha Toffolo said no additional funding had been secured after the Department of Environment funded Phase 2. Staff could seek funding for Phase 3; a less costly risk-assessment study was another option, but contamination would remain in place with restrictions.
- Result or follow-up
- Phase 3 had not started because funding was required.
Councillor Stevenson asked whether staff were looking for other funding sources for the next environmental assessment work.
- Answer recorded
- Samantha Toffolo said staff had been unsuccessful in obtaining funding from the Government of Nunavut Department of Environment and had not pursued other funding sources.
- Result or follow-up
- No alternate funding source was identified in this written record.
He asked whether the contaminated sites still had to be protected and zoned accordingly even though the Phase 2 assessment did not identify a current threat to soil or groundwater.
- Answer recorded
- Samantha Toffolo said the Land Administration By-law requires contaminated land to be remediated because of liability. She added that risk-assessment studies can identify the contamination and recommend restrictions on the land.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes identify remediation or restrictions as the applicable controls.
Councillor Stevenson asked for clarification as to what happens on the land that does not have a land use permit and whether activities should stop on this parcel while staff gather information on the explosive storage building and explosive storage.
- Answer recorded
- Councillor Sheppard agreed that the information should be presented at the next available meeting, possibly Council.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Councillor Stevenson asked if the business indicated why they did not have the aggregate removed and land remediated as it was clearly indicated to them last year.
- Answer recorded
- Ms. Nakawungu advised that the business indicated they have not prepared another area to relocate the material and are requesting renewal of the Land Use Permit.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Councillor Stevenson asked if the Club was changing the structure on the lot to meet requirements.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds explained that an important aspect of the MOU is Clause 2 requiring a not- for-profit organization and the terms of the lease will be terminated if the lands are used to generate profits. He pointed out that the land has been shared with different organizations and it must be clear that the land can only be used for nonprofit use.
- Result or follow-up
- Check later records for a result.
Councillor Stevenson asked what the reference to an Inuit-owned developer meant so he could determine whether he had a conflict of interest.
- Answer recorded
- Mathew Dodds said the expansion was aligned with the draft NTI Inuit Housing Action Plan and the Land Administration By-law’s private-development framework. A request for proposals would be required and no developer had been identified.
- Result or follow-up
- Stevenson concluded that no decision about a particular developer was before the committee and did not declare a conflict at that time.
Councillor Stevenson asked if there were items that could be completed so an application could be submitted for Round 2 of the Housing Accelerator Fund.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds advised that a funding application would be submitted in the first quarter of 2025.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
He inquired about the definition of a parking space and if the size had been addressed.
- Answer recorded
- Ms. Toffolo explained that the current Zoning By-law includes that parking stalls be a minimum of 2.7 metres long and 6 metres wide, which is generally a larger sized parking stall. She indicated that there are challenges in Iqaluit and options have been discussed for reviewing parking stall orientation and size.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Councillor Stevenson asked for confirmation that the proposed amendment was for parking in the Core Area for residential units only.
- Answer recorded
- Councillor Stevenson reiterated that he was aware that the proposed amendment was needed for the Housing Accelerator Fund Application. He noted that during the task forces, there was discussion about parking reduction, at which time, he expressed concern regarding the reduction of parking and the need for parking spaces for vehicles, snowmobiles, boats and qamutiik. Councillor Stevenson reiterated once again that parking is an issue and needs to be addressed.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Councillor Stevenson inquired about the timeline and community consultation.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds noted that there were various methods of community engagement when the draft plan was originally drafted and staff felt that the community input was captured. Mr. Dodds advised that there would be other opportunities through the Public Hearing process for community input, and if the three hazard mapping exercises revealed new information that affects the community, staff would obtain additional community input and discussion.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Written-record minimum only. Multi-part exchanges may be compressed in the minutes, so the number retains a plus sign until audio is checked.
2025 WRITTEN QUESTIONS · AVAILABLE MINUTES AUDITED
69distinct substantive questions documented from January 21 through December 9
Property tax3
Snowmobile trail3
Family housing3
46-unit housing3
Affordable housing3
Cabin access2
Procurement2
Property assessment2
Traffic enforcement2
Accessibility2
By-law review2
Transit1
Pedestrian access1
Snow removal1
Construction schedule1
Road access1
Easement1
Traffic study1
Emergency access1
Housing1
Federal land1
Site cleanup1
Road ownership1
Unsightly land1
Homeownership1
Homeownership enforcement1
Housing design1
Public process1
Apex retail1
Quarry fees1
Temporary land use1
ATCO Loop housing1
Joamie Court paving1
Joamie Court sewer1
Joamie Court costs1
Permit compliance1
Construction extension1
Committee review1
Waste facilities1
Fire hall1
Municipal land1
Dog-team land1
West 40 disposal1
West 40 timing1
Parking1
Lot status1
Site access1
West 40 affordability1
West 40 pricing1
West 40 levies1
Land pricing1
Industrial relocation1
Inuit preference1
After a cabin permit was issued, could people still walk through the plot?
- Answer recorded
- The minutes record the question during discussion of public river access but do not record a direct answer.
- Result or follow-up
- No direct answer is documented.
Would fences be permitted if they blocked access to the river?
- Answer recorded
- The minutes record the question but do not record a direct answer.
- Result or follow-up
- No direct answer is documented.
What revenue would the Option 3A institutional and industrial mill rates produce?
- Answer recorded
- Finance said institutional revenue would rise by about $1.2 million and industrial revenue by about $316,000.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Why did Sheppard recommend Option 3A rather than Option 3B?
- Answer recorded
- Sheppard said the options differed mainly in the proposed commercial increase and restated the lower increases he had supported.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Were comparable-community statistics available for commercial and mixed-use mill rates?
- Answer recorded
- Finance said staff had not sourced comparable mill rates and had instead reviewed Iqaluit's past practice.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What was the next step for the proposed shuttle service?
- Answer recorded
- Municipal Enforcement said council approval would be followed by an application meeting the livery-licence requirements.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
How would the Astro Hill walkways be delineated?
- Answer recorded
- Planning described parking rails and a guard rail.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Who would clear snow from the private walkways and trails?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said Nunastar was understood to be responsible.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
When would the Astro Hill Lookout building be constructed?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said civil work was complete and construction would begin that year.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Why was the road not opening as a throughway before the full development was finished?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the master plan was an artistic rendering and the developer could confirm long-term opening plans.
- Result or follow-up
- The long-term opening plan was not confirmed in the minutes.
Where was the access easement on the survey sketch?
- Answer recorded
- Planning identified the proposed easement using the marked sketch.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Could council review the Traffic Impact Study?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said councillors could review it, while noting translation difficulty because of its size.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Where was the emergency-access gate on the survey sketch?
- Answer recorded
- The minutes list the question but do not record a separate answer.
- Result or follow-up
- No separate answer is documented.
How many bedrooms and how much floor area would each proposed unit have?
- Answer recorded
- Planning recorded five two-bedroom units and one one-bedroom unit and said minimum-size rules applied.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Were there plans to acquire private property crossed by the proposed snowmobile trail?
- Answer recorded
- Planning described existing Happy Valley connections and said staff would examine trails on private property.
- Result or follow-up
- Trail acquisition work remained under review.
How would the trail be marked so the land remained reserved for snowmobile use?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said it was designated and would receive trail markers after discussion with Public Works.
- Result or follow-up
- Marker placement was still to be discussed.
Was Planning aware that council wanted developments to include three-bedroom units?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said staff conveyed that preference and the draft General Plan and zoning by-law included larger-unit language.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Had the City acquired other owned and surveyed lots in the same vicinity?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said nearby surveyed lots remained federal and the City had acquired none in the previous 20 years.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Was it reasonable to require the federal government to clear debris before transfer?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the proposed transfer was on an as-is basis.
- Result or follow-up
- Cleanup options were to return before the acquisition by-law readings.
Did the City own the access-road land?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said it was untitled municipal land under municipal jurisdiction but not registered to the City at land titles.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would the Unsightly Lands By-law apply to the lot?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said its department did not enforce that by-law.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Why did section 5.5(c) refer to a Schedule C that did not exist?
- Answer recorded
- Finance confirmed the schedule did not exist and said the reference would be removed.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Was it clear that contract awards had to wait until funding streams were in place?
- Answer recorded
- Finance said any more restrictive funding-program rules would govern an award so the City retained funding eligibility.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What changes would be made to the walkway?
- Answer recorded
- Planning described replacing the rear boardwalk with gravel, connecting it to a new right-of-way and improving drainage and safety.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Who would maintain the walkways?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the City owned the existing boardwalk and would own the new walkway.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What was the bedroom mix?
- Answer recorded
- NHC recorded 30 one-bedroom, 11 two-bedroom and five three-bedroom units.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
How would resale and property value work if an owner sold?
- Answer recorded
- Planning described 99-year leases, a 20-year owner-occupancy term and later valuation through the sketch-plan process.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Could the City prevent owner-occupied units from becoming staff housing or rentals?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the amendment lacked enforcement provisions and options such as spot checks would return later.
- Result or follow-up
- Enforcement recommendations were promised.
Did staff have input into the final design of the addition?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said small-residential design policies were limited and staff had not controlled the final design.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would approval proceed without a public hearing and allow construction?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said council's motion would formalize the decision and residents retained an appeal period.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Was the rezoning application for the existing Apex store?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said a store was operating but it could not legally operate until approval.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Did any lots receive more than a ten-percent land-value reduction for drainage or topography?
- Answer recorded
- The assessor was not aware of any receiving a twenty-percent reduction for those conditions.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What was the difference between an assessor correction and an appeal?
- Answer recorded
- The assessor explained that a correction addressed an error found through review when no formal appeal had been filed.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would extraction fees be passed on to contractors?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said contractors expected project costs to rise and the expense would be passed through.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Was the applicant the former West 40 permit holder, and had the earlier issue been resolved?
- Answer recorded
- Planning confirmed it was, said the old permit ended and described efforts to remove remaining encumbrances.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Why were Motor Vehicle Act offence numbers so low?
- Answer recorded
- RCMP could not provide further detail and promised a report at the next meeting.
- Result or follow-up
- A next-meeting report was promised.
Was other police work preventing Motor Vehicle Act enforcement?
- Answer recorded
- RCMP said Criminal Code matters took priority.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What was the proposed bedroom mix?
- Answer recorded
- Planning recorded 24 one-bedroom, 18 two-bedroom and six three-bedroom units, with 20 percent barrier-free.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
How was the number of affordable units determined?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said it met CMHC's definition.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What did affordable rental mean in this proposal?
- Answer recorded
- Planning referred to CMHC values; Uquutaq described an income-tested, Inuit-specific program based on a 2020 survey.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Could the proponent access affordable-housing funding for the 16 units?
- Answer recorded
- Uquutaq said several programs were available, including Nunavut's housing-supply incentive.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Had staff asked the dental-clinic housing developer for three-bedroom units?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said it communicated council's preference and was drafting a larger-unit policy not yet enforceable.
- Result or follow-up
- The larger-unit policy remained in draft.
Was an elevator required in the four-storey building?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the project was legally three storeys with a loft and did not require an elevator.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would extending construction terms delay subdivision paving?
- Answer recorded
- Planning did not know the paving schedule and noted a new lessee could receive up to two years.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Were the sewer upgrades complete?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said one capital-project item remained but the area was generally cleared for small-scale development.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Was the reported on-site sewer-tank cost accurate?
- Answer recorded
- Planning verified earlier advice that it could cost up to $300,000, depending on development size.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Had duplex materials been ordered without a development permit?
- Answer recorded
- Planning confirmed materials were ordered without a permit or fees and said approval was uncertain.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
If an extension allowed a different design, how would that affect the decision to proceed?
- Answer recorded
- The developer said amendments would be considered and it wanted to build after investing in the lot.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Could the index be sorted to provide additional information to council?
- Answer recorded
- The clerk said it was an Excel file and staff could provide identified categories for review.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Could staff provide obsolete, housekeeping and active by-law lists for the November meeting?
- Answer recorded
- The minutes record the request without a direct answer.
- Result or follow-up
- Delivery by November was not confirmed in the minutes.
Would the standing-committee report be ready for the next meeting?
- Answer recorded
- Administration said the framework and report would return at the next meeting.
- Result or follow-up
- A next-meeting report was promised.
Were the waste-transfer-station and landfill projects complete and becoming operational assets in 2025?
- Answer recorded
- Administration said both projects were finalized in 2025, but operations would be addressed in the 2026 operating budget and the bale system would be phased in.
- Result or follow-up
- Operational timing and costs remained pending.
Was a new fire hall no longer a priority?
- Answer recorded
- Administration said no construction funding was secured, current-hall improvements would proceed and a $500,000 infrastructure review would revisit the options.
- Result or follow-up
- The infrastructure review and workshop remained pending.
Was the area between proposed locations A and C reserved for a vehicle impound lot?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said it had been reserved for an impound lot but was later repurposed for dog-pound expansion.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What regulations governed structures on the existing dog-team area?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the land was then General Industrial, structures lacked permits and an Open Space designation could better regulate culturally related sheds and storage.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
How would occupied West 40 lots, particularly Lots 33–35, be disposed of fairly?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the Commissioner-owned lots would be vacated and offered through competition without weighting current occupants.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would lots be disposed of soon enough for use in the 2026 construction season?
- Answer recorded
- Planning anticipated the first competition in the first or second quarter of 2026, subject to approvals, design and surveying.
- Result or follow-up
- The 2026 disposal timeline remained conditional.
Did staff communicate council's desire for three-bedroom units?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said three-bedroom units were discussed, but the City lacked regulatory power to require them.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Did the developer intend to use the adjacent City lot for parking?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said six on-site spaces were proposed and described the Core Area parking standard.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Had the developer considered access to upper floors?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said upper-floor accessibility had not been discussed with the developer.
- Result or follow-up
- Accessibility beyond the ground floor remained unaddressed in the minutes.
When were the two development lots amalgamated?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said they had not been formally amalgamated; they were adjacent and under common ownership.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What provisions protected the integrity of the snowmobile trail?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the drainage easement protected intersecting trail areas and the building could not occupy the easement.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Was there access to the lot near the church?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said a nearby lot had been landlocked but a drainage easement existed.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would market pricing and no instalments restrict lots to applicants with more capital?
- Answer recorded
- Planning acknowledged that no-instalment terms could be a barrier, although the land price was expected to be smaller than later development costs.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would West 40 lots cost less than the recently disposed Joamie Court lots?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said West 40 would use market value and might be cheaper because the lots were unimproved and had fewer potential buyers.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Did the estimated $747,000 drainage levy apply only to Phase 1 or the whole subdivision?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the levy related to the full subdivision.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Why use market value rather than cost recovery?
- Answer recorded
- Planning cited council's 2021 policy, varying lot conditions, fairness and the ability to avoid selling below development cost.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Which existing industrial lots were actually being displaced by QIA development?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said it was not aware of any company being displaced by the master plan.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Did committee expect Inuit preference in West 40 lot disposal?
- Answer recorded
- The minutes record the question but no direct answer before the next exchange.
- Result or follow-up
- No committee position was recorded in response.
Every entry is a concise paraphrase of the written minutes. The Jan. 14 workshop has attendance only, and the May 8 Governance minute link is unavailable. Missing records are not evidence of silence.
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS & PROMISED FOLLOW-UPS · 2025
Cabin access
After a cabin permit was issued, could people still walk through the plot?
Recorded answer: The minutes record the question during discussion of public river access but do not record a direct answer.
Follow-up: No direct answer is documented.
Official minutes ↗Cabin access
Would fences be permitted if they blocked access to the river?
Recorded answer: The minutes record the question but do not record a direct answer.
Follow-up: No direct answer is documented.
Official minutes ↗Road access
Why was the road not opening as a throughway before the full development was finished?
Recorded answer: Planning said the master plan was an artistic rendering and the developer could confirm long-term opening plans.
Follow-up: The long-term opening plan was not confirmed in the minutes.
Official minutes ↗Emergency access
Where was the emergency-access gate on the survey sketch?
Recorded answer: The minutes list the question but do not record a separate answer.
Follow-up: No separate answer is documented.
Official minutes ↗Snowmobile trail
Were there plans to acquire private property crossed by the proposed snowmobile trail?
Recorded answer: Planning described existing Happy Valley connections and said staff would examine trails on private property.
Follow-up: Trail acquisition work remained under review.
Official minutes ↗Snowmobile trail
How would the trail be marked so the land remained reserved for snowmobile use?
Recorded answer: Planning said it was designated and would receive trail markers after discussion with Public Works.
Follow-up: Marker placement was still to be discussed.
Official minutes ↗Site cleanup
Was it reasonable to require the federal government to clear debris before transfer?
Recorded answer: Planning said the proposed transfer was on an as-is basis.
Follow-up: Cleanup options were to return before the acquisition by-law readings.
Official minutes ↗Homeownership enforcement
Could the City prevent owner-occupied units from becoming staff housing or rentals?
Recorded answer: Planning said the amendment lacked enforcement provisions and options such as spot checks would return later.
Follow-up: Enforcement recommendations were promised.
Official minutes ↗Traffic enforcement
Why were Motor Vehicle Act offence numbers so low?
Recorded answer: RCMP could not provide further detail and promised a report at the next meeting.
Follow-up: A next-meeting report was promised.
Official minutes ↗Family housing
Had staff asked the dental-clinic housing developer for three-bedroom units?
Recorded answer: Planning said it communicated council's preference and was drafting a larger-unit policy not yet enforceable.
Follow-up: The larger-unit policy remained in draft.
Official minutes ↗By-law review
Could staff provide obsolete, housekeeping and active by-law lists for the November meeting?
Recorded answer: The minutes record the request without a direct answer.
Follow-up: Delivery by November was not confirmed in the minutes.
Official minutes ↗Committee review
Would the standing-committee report be ready for the next meeting?
Recorded answer: Administration said the framework and report would return at the next meeting.
Follow-up: A next-meeting report was promised.
Official minutes ↗Waste facilities
Were the waste-transfer-station and landfill projects complete and becoming operational assets in 2025?
Recorded answer: Administration said both projects were finalized in 2025, but operations would be addressed in the 2026 operating budget and the bale system would be phased in.
Follow-up: Operational timing and costs remained pending.
Official minutes ↗Fire hall
Was a new fire hall no longer a priority?
Recorded answer: Administration said no construction funding was secured, current-hall improvements would proceed and a $500,000 infrastructure review would revisit the options.
Follow-up: The infrastructure review and workshop remained pending.
Official minutes ↗West 40 timing
Would lots be disposed of soon enough for use in the 2026 construction season?
Recorded answer: Planning anticipated the first competition in the first or second quarter of 2026, subject to approvals, design and surveying.
Follow-up: The 2026 disposal timeline remained conditional.
Official minutes ↗Accessibility
Had the developer considered access to upper floors?
Recorded answer: Planning said upper-floor accessibility had not been discussed with the developer.
Follow-up: Accessibility beyond the ground floor remained unaddressed in the minutes.
Official minutes ↗Inuit preference
Did committee expect Inuit preference in West 40 lot disposal?
Recorded answer: The minutes record the question but no direct answer before the next exchange.
Follow-up: No committee position was recorded in response.
Official minutes ↗EDITORIAL SELECTION · REMARKS FROM ACROSS THE 2025 RECORD
Paraphrase
Paid taxi vouchers should be treated like cash, and residents, especially elders, should not bear the burden of exchanging older vouchers.
Stevenson spoke after the City issued information about undated and older taxi vouchers.
Official minutes ↗Condensed quotation
Committee effectiveness can depend on “structure, chair or simply luck.”
Stevenson supported further examination of public engagement while acknowledging that committees do not always produce results.
Official minutes ↗This selected section can include debate and other agenda items; it is not the formal Statements ledger. Remarks are kept separate from the question count. Labels distinguish exact wording, condensed wording and paraphrase.
FORMAL COUNCILLOR STATEMENTS LEDGER
6 written-record entries
Only remarks filed under the regular council agenda’s formal STATEMENTS item. This is separate from debate remarks, questions and the editorial “notable statements” selection above.
INDIVIDUALLY RECORDED POSITIONS · DIVIDED VOTES
Opposed
For
Opposed
For
Motion PD 24-13 · Recommend Astro Hill mixed-use permit with traffic study
Carried · 5–3
Official minutes ↗For
For
For
Motion 24-100 / 24-101 · Cannabis, tobacco and vaping by-law, first and second readings
Both carried · 7–1
Official minutes ↗For
Opposed
For
Absent
For
For
Opposed
For
Opposed
Opposed
Motion 25-04 / 25-10 · 2025 Mill Rate By-law, first and second readings
Both carried · 4–3
Official minutes ↗Absent
Absent
Motion 25-27 · Property Tax Exemption By-law, third and final reading
Carried · 3–2
Official minutes ↗For
For
Motion PD 25-08 · Acquire vacant federal Upper Base lot for one dollar
Carried · 5–1
Official minutes ↗For
For
Opposed
Absent
Opposed
Motion 25-207 / 25-210 · Apex NHC land-disposal by-law, first and second readings
Both carried · 3–1
Official minutes ↗For
Motion 25-258 · Public Safety Committee restructuring
Defeated · 3–4 after mayor's deciding vote
Official minutes ↗Absent
Motion 26-75 · Cannabis-establishment zoning, first reading
Carried · 5 for · 1 abstained
Official minutes ↗For
Opposed
Absent
This section does not treat moving or seconding a motion as a vote. Unanimous results without individual names remain collective records. “Absent,” “Conflict,” “Abstained” and “Not in office” are kept separate.
HOW TO READ THIS FILE
Presence, moving a motion, questioning and voting are different records
Attendance reproduces the City’s quarterly grids and separates formal council meetings from committees, hearings and workshops. Motion counts cover 35 written motion records from 2025 and available 2026 registries through August 25. “Substantive” removes agenda and minutes approval, in-camera transitions and adjournment. The question number is a minimum from written minutes; audio may raise it. None of these numbers proves how much work a member did outside the chamber.
For a mayor, council voting is treated separately: the mayor normally votes only to break a tie. Committee participation can create a different voting record.