Term events attended through June 30, 2026.
← All councillor filesAll reported events65 of 100 Council meetings only29 of 48 Motions moved34 total Questions, kept by year2023: 7 · 2024: 24+ · 2025: 43 · 2026: 22+ Full term comparison and caveats → 2024 · all reported33/44 · 75% 2025 · all reported23/34 · 68% 2026 through June 30 · all reported9/22 · 41% 2024 · council only18/23 · 78% 2025 · council only9/17 · 53% 2026 through June 30 · council only2/8 · 25% Open this member’s statements →
COUNCILLOR FILE
Harry Flaherty
Alternate Deputy Mayor
65%term attendance · all reported
Term council meetings attended through June 30, 2026.
26 in 2025 · 8 in 2026 through August 25. 26 classified substantive across both years.
2023, 2024 and 2025 use audited written minutes. The 2024 plus sign remains until audio is checked. The 2026 floor uses 23 minute sets plus five complete audio audits through August 25.
CURRENT TERM · COMPARABLE THROUGH JUNE 30, 2026
One formula used across the Site
Estimated council pay$67,500
÷Reported events attended65
=Estimated pay per attendance$1,038
Same cutoff and records as the Attendance page: January 2024 through June 2026. This is not verified payroll and it is not a performance grade. The archive begins November 14, 2023, but a comparable 2023 quarterly attendance grid has not yet been indexed.
BREAKDOWN BEHIND THE TERM TOTAL
Attendance by year and quarter
The headline above combines these same City reports. These smaller periods explain the total; they are not competing scores.
PresentAbsentNot eligible / not reported
City quarterly attendance grids.
City quarterly attendance grids.
City Q1 and Q2 attendance grids.
SELECTED EXAMPLES · NOT A TOTAL
Land deadline
Moved a committee recommendation extending the construction deadline for Lot 27, Block 242.
Official record ↗2026 FULL-AUDIO QUESTION LEDGER · COMPLETED RECORDINGS
2timestamped questions or substantive requests found in the completed recordings
How can Economic Development assist people who want to start a business?
- Answer on record
- Economic Development said needs vary, but staff can provide one-on-one guidance, identify resources and help entrepreneurs navigate available programs.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
Are applicants' outstanding arrears to the City considered when quarry and land-use permits are reviewed?
- Answer on record
- Planning said an arrears check is required for all departmental applications under the Land Administration By-law and General Plan.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
This ledger contains only completed full-audio audits. It does not treat unaudited recordings as silence, and it remains separate from the complete 2025 written-question ledger.
2023 TERM-START WRITTEN QUESTIONS
7attributed substantive questions from November 14 through December 12
Was QIA Lands consulted about development beside Inuit Owned Land?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said QIA had been consulted through the application process.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Had community consultation occurred about the site used by hunters and berry pickers?
- Answer recorded
- Planning described the public process and said the proponent had consulted nearby land interests.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Was there a master plan for land beside Road to Nowhere?
- Answer recorded
- Planning described the General Plan and future subdivision planning.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
How would direct disposal in ATCO Loop work?
- Answer recorded
- Planning explained that consolidation and direct disposal would regularize the existing development pattern.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Had a green-space or public-use option been considered for the Lake Subdivision lot?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the institutional designation permitted public uses and council would determine the disposal process.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would council receive a report showing the cost and timeline for the five planned 2024 water projects?
- Answer recorded
- The project team said detailed dashboard reporting was available and monthly reporting could be provided.
- Result or follow-up
- Detailed monthly reporting and possible presentations were discussed.
Was the long-term water project's completion timeline comparable with other Colliers projects?
- Answer recorded
- The project team discussed design and construction milestones and the complexity of Iqaluit's program.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Six additional November 21 questions were recorded without a speaker's name. They appear in the meeting and year totals but are not assigned to any profile.
2024 WRITTEN-RECORD QUESTION FLOOR
24+substantive questions or requests attributed in all located 2024 written minutes
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked for a summary of existing projects.
- Answer recorded
- Councillor Sheppard commented that a workshop should be held to discuss the Engineering and Public Works projects that are being carried out. He advised that public consultation during the budget process had not been carried out.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
He asked if the Capital planning process included community consultations.
- Answer recorded
- Councillor Sheppard commented that a workshop should be held to discuss the Engineering and Public Works projects that are being carried out. He advised that public consultation during the budget process had not been carried out.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked if the new Capital Spending Plan projects could be highlighted.
- Answer recorded
- Councillor Sheppard pointed out that the first section listed the 2023 carryover projects, which were budgeted in 2023 and would be completed in 2024. He pointed out that the ongoing sewer and water upgrades had different projects budgeted each year.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked if the Procurement By-law required purchases to be called under a public tender process.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Mugford advised that the Procurement By-law outlined how to call a public tender and the standard and practices for procurement are followed.
- Result or follow-up
- Check later records for a result.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked for clarification on Public Works and Transportation, contracted costs.
- Answer recorded
- Councillor Sheppard explained that the contracted costs related to the water breaks and the requirement to call in third-party contractors.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
He asked for the definition of a capital item.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Tumilty explained that capital assets were long-term assets that were expected to have a useful life of more than one year and are depreciated over time to reflect their use. He also noted that capital expenditures were purchases of assets that exceeded $5,000 or $10,000. Mr. Tumilty pointed out that normal repair and maintenance was not considered a capital expense, but whenever it is improved, the costs are capitalized and the value added to the asset.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked for clarification regarding the proposed building having both residential and commercial space.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Michael Croteau explained that the proposed structure could include one or two housing units located above the commercial space.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked for clarification regarding the relocation of the sewer line.
- Answer recorded
- Samantha Toffolo explained that one buried sewer line runs through the parking area and serves Qulliq Energy Corporation. Under the concept plan it would not have to be relocated, and parking stalls could not be placed within the easement.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked if the increase in the delegated authority was for a specified time.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds advised that increasing the delegated authority did not have a time limit. He noted that whenever General Plan By-law No. 898 and Zoning By-law No. 899 were being reviewed, changes could be made.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked if the cost of the three trucks fell within the approved Capital Spending Plan.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. England confirmed that the purchase amount was within the approved budget.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
He asked for clarification regarding reading of water meters and when the property owner was responsible.
- Answer recorded
- Steve England, Chief Administrative Officer, explained that the property line was used to determine responsibility of the City and property owner.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty noted that the Astro Hill complex had been growing for the past few years and asked if a Traffic Study had been conducted as the area was busy.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds noted that traffic, access and parking was a concern at Astro Hill and perhaps a Traffic Study should be conducted.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
He asked if the proposed development was part of the Rapid Housing Plan.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds noted that the proposed development fell within the study area to increase building heights. He explained that amendments to the General Plan and Zoning By-law regarding the Housing Accelerator Fund and Housing Action Plan take up to ten months for approval. In the meantime, variances would have to be approved on an as-needed basis.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked if a questionnaire was available at the aquatic centre for users to provide input regarding the designation of the saunas.
- Answer recorded
- Deputy Mayor Smith explained that this was a recommendation and no public consultation has been held.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked for clarification on Tower Arctic Ltd.
- Answer recorded
- Ms. Adeleke advised that Dillon Consulting Limited designed the bridge and their contract expired in 2022 and was not extended as the project was not approved for the 2023 Capital Spending Plan. Ms. Adeleke explained that in order to provide support during the tendering process, Dillon Consulting Limited had a contract for engineering support to enable them to review bids and provide input during the tendering process.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty noted that he received comments from community members that they have been asked to not walk dogs in the area.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds advised that no community engagement had been held in the Plateau area regarding the matter. Mr. Dodds noted the concern and indicated he would investigate the matter.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
He asked if there has been any community engagement in the Plateau area.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds advised that no community engagement had been held in the Plateau area regarding the matter. Mr. Dodds noted the concern and indicated he would investigate the matter.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty inquired as to whether the Municipal Enforcement Department had enough staff to enforce the clean up as soon as possible.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. England indicated that staffing levels are currently suitable for the particular matters being worked on now. He noted that for the future by-law, there will be some comments on how that can be enforced moving forward.
- Result or follow-up
- Check later records for a result.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked whether the proposed cabin-zone policy would receive public consultation.
- Answer recorded
- Mathew Dodds clarified that the memo itself had not been shared with the Amaruq Hunters and Trappers Association; staff had summarized the policy’s intent and asked for its cooperation and future feedback.
- Result or follow-up
- The answer described engagement with the hunters and trappers association but did not record a date or format for broader public consultation.
He asked if consideration was being given in the policy to allow people to pitch tents.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds clarified that the memo has not been shared with the Amaruq Hunters and Trappers Association. He advised that staff provided them with a summary of the intent of the policy and requested their cooperation and future discussions. Mr. Dodds noted that the Amarug Hunters and Trappers Association indicated that they would cooperate and provide feedback.
- Result or follow-up
- Check later records for a result.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty inquired about how frequently the same applicant could apply for the grant.
- Answer recorded
- Ms. Toffolo advised that there was no restriction on the frequency by applicants and any project cannot receive more than $750,000 in funding. She clarified that the approval of applications by the Director of Planning and Development was envisioned as a collaboration between staff and the applicant to ensure the application meets the requirements prior to approval. She noted that projects would require a Development Permit and could be referred to the Committee for approval.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
He asked about the Director of Planning and Development approving the applications as outlined in Clause 9 (e).
- Answer recorded
- Ms. Toffolo advised that there was no restriction on the frequency by applicants and any project cannot receive more than $750,000 in funding. She clarified that the approval of applications by the Director of Planning and Development was envisioned as a collaboration between staff and the applicant to ensure the application meets the requirements prior to approval. She noted that projects would require a Development Permit and could be referred to the Committee for approval.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked if the Director of Planning and Development has signing authority for up to $750,000.
- Answer recorded
- Mathew Dodds, Director of Planning and Development, agreed that “discretion” should be amended in Clause 9 (e). He advised that he does not have signing authority for up to $750,000. He explained that the Director of Planning and Development would approve the application and the expenditure would be authorized by the Chief Administrative Officer.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked how increases in the aquatic centre’s $4.4-million Recreation and Cultural budget could be mitigated.
- Answer recorded
- Bill Williams, Senior Executive Director of Municipal Infrastructure and Planning, said staff would seek operational savings. He identified utility and fuel costs (because the building uses substantial water and electricity) and required aquatic-program staffing ratios as major cost drivers.
- Result or follow-up
- Staff said it would look for savings; no quantified reduction is recorded here.
Written-record minimum only. Multi-part exchanges may be compressed in the minutes, so the number retains a plus sign until audio is checked.
2025 WRITTEN QUESTIONS · AVAILABLE MINUTES AUDITED
43distinct substantive questions documented from January 21 through December 9
Capital budget3
Winter trail2
Eight-storey housing2
Fire capacity2
Quarry fees2
By-law review2
Temporary land use2
Winter trail consultation1
Permit enforcement1
Traffic study1
Road infrastructure1
Operating budget1
Committee appointments1
Water capacity1
Funding applications1
Non-conforming housing1
Flood liability1
Summer policing1
ATCO Loop consultation1
ATCO Loop timeline1
Mixed-use development1
Housing land1
Development charges1
Quarry enforcement1
Taxi vouchers1
Emergency dispatch1
Road paving1
Lagoon1
Critical pipelines1
Capital financing1
Environmental protection1
Construction laydown1
Non-profit land1
West 40 environment1
Inuit preference1
How many trips or loads were expected to remove the equipment?
- Answer recorded
- De Beers expected 40 to 50 loads in 2025, moved by four-tractor convoys.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Had the required permits and licences been obtained?
- Answer recorded
- The proponent listed its CIRNAC land-use permit, Nunavut Planning Commission review and City application.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Had De Beers consulted the hunters and trappers organizations about increased public trail use?
- Answer recorded
- The proponent said it met both Iqaluit and Pangnirtung organizations, which supported the trail, and discussed safety and emergency response.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would municipal authorities ensure compliance inside the municipal boundary?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said staff inspect new land-use permits; Administration said remote monitoring would require contracted services.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Could council receive the Astro Hill Traffic Impact Study?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said Engineering had reviewed it and councillors could review the large document.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Should road modifications be undertaken by the City or the applicant's transportation engineer?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the applicant was responsible for water and sewer connections; the minutes do not record a direct answer allocating road-modification responsibility.
- Result or follow-up
- Road-modification responsibility was not directly resolved.
How many staff positions would receive the collective-agreement-related increase?
- Answer recorded
- Finance could not give an exact number and said a full complement was 160 to 200 employees depending on casual staffing.
- Result or follow-up
- An exact number was not provided.
Were the two absent councillors interested in serving on Governance and Priorities?
- Answer recorded
- Administration said deferral was council's decision; council deferred the appointments.
- Result or follow-up
- Appointments were deferred.
What recommendations had council made on the proposed eight-storey development?
- Answer recorded
- Planning summarized responses involving water, traffic, density, pedestrian safety, bedroom mix, storage and design.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Had public consultation been held?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the developer held a public engagement session using preliminary plans.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Did the Fire Department have equipment required for an eight-storey building?
- Answer recorded
- Planning cited fire-needs and capacity assessments, said the ladder truck was acceptable and said territorial officials would review the design.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Could the building sit empty because its permit preceded the City's water-upgrade plan?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said Engineering did not expect it to sit empty and the permit could be extended.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Could council receive the Fire Department Needs Assessment?
- Answer recorded
- The request is recorded, but delivery is not confirmed in these minutes.
- Result or follow-up
- Document delivery was not confirmed.
Was it standard practice for staff to seek council approval of funding requests?
- Answer recorded
- Finance said approval was obtained when required by the funder, as it was here.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
How was the dwelling legally non-conforming and encroaching into another yard?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said it predated current rules and might reflect later surveying or older standards.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would the City be liable if the stream flooded the proposed addition?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the developer knew the risk, planned higher piles and the City would not be liable.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would officers patrol the liquor store and beaches by vehicle and ATV during summer?
- Answer recorded
- RCMP said patrols would continue, random check stops would increase and members were training on roadside screening devices.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would community consultation occur before the mixed-use development proceeded?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the area was designated high density and Uquutaq had conducted community engagement.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
When would the concept plan be available?
- Answer recorded
- Planning expected a development-permit application in approximately seven months, tied to funding.
- Result or follow-up
- The target remained conditional.
What commercial use would occupy the ground floor?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said no tenant was secured and the proponent sought a non-profit or low-cost commercial tenant.
- Result or follow-up
- The tenant remained unknown.
Could council control what NHC constructed on the vacant Apex lot?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the lot was too small for a ballot, was intended for public housing and could fit a smaller prefabricated three-bedroom unit.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Were funds budgeted for the City to cover the remaining development charge?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said development charges fund capital projects and that various sources offset those projects, without identifying a specific budget line.
- Result or follow-up
- A specific funding source was not identified in the minutes.
Was the $7.50-per-cubic-metre extraction fee new?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said it was a new fee and the previous extraction fee had last been collected in 2017.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What revenue was expected during the ten-month quarry permit?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said little extraction remained for the permit period but did not provide a dollar estimate.
- Result or follow-up
- No revenue estimate was recorded.
Would a company face a penalty for earlier non-compliance before receiving a quarry permit?
- Answer recorded
- Administration described notices, discussions and arrears checks, and said no arrears were owing, but did not record a separate penalty.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What process determines whether a by-law needs amendment?
- Answer recorded
- Administration said new by-laws going to council should first be presented to committee.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What happens when a by-law arises from an ongoing council discussion without going to committee?
- Answer recorded
- Administration said new by-laws should be presented to committee before council.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Could administration investigate taxi vouchers without printed expiry dates being rejected and print expiry information when applicable?
- Answer recorded
- Administration said vouchers without a printed date did not expire; Caribou Cabs agreed to continue honouring them and the City said it would issue an update.
- Result or follow-up
- A public-information update was promised.
Did the capital plan include both new and ongoing projects?
- Answer recorded
- Finance said the draft showed both 2025 and 2026 projects and staff continued moving non-capital items to the operating budget.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What qualifies as a capital project?
- Answer recorded
- Finance cited long-term tangible assets, construction, design and some plans and studies.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Did the colour chart identify multi-year projects?
- Answer recorded
- Finance said it did not and promised to add a way to identify them.
- Result or follow-up
- A multi-year marker was promised.
Had staff considered replacing outdated dispatch equipment?
- Answer recorded
- Administration said it was unaware of a problem but Silent Knight upgrades were planned that year.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Was underground work considered before paving Apex and Plateau?
- Answer recorded
- Administration said safety was the priority, no underground work was anticipated and drainage improvements would accompany paving.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Why was lagoon aeration construction scheduled for 2027, and could it begin sooner?
- Answer recorded
- Administration said design and engineering were budgeted for 2026, construction for 2027 and dredging would be funded in operations.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What makes a pipeline critical?
- Answer recorded
- Administration cited individual renewals and patches, historical failures, studies, modelling of older areas and Public Works priorities.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Where would the roughly $83-million capital budget funding come from?
- Answer recorded
- Finance identified approximately 56% federal, 7.25% territorial and 36.52% City funding, with reserves and operating revenues supporting cash flow.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What precautions would apply if fuel or oil spilled at the Canadrill temporary site?
- Answer recorded
- Planning cited territorial environmental law, investigation and applicant-funded remediation.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What assurance prevented the eight-month permit from being extended?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said any extension would return with other renewal requests and was not guaranteed.
- Result or follow-up
- No absolute assurance was recorded.
How were potential applicants told that land was available for temporary permits?
- Answer recorded
- The deputy mayor and Planning described an open application process, prior land inventory and the Land Administration Policy.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would the City retain access to lots for temporary construction laydown?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said West 40 lots were intended for long-term leases and other temporary areas were being explored.
- Result or follow-up
- Alternative temporary laydown locations were still being explored.
Where did non-profit organizations fit within the West 40 plan?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said some non-profits might bid on eco-tourism lots while on-the-land organizations generally sought roadless locations.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Had environmental assessments been conducted in the West 40?
- Answer recorded
- Planning referred back to environmental assessments discussed at the previous meeting.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Did the lot-disposal criteria provide preference to Inuit under the Nunavut Agreement?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said no such preference applied to commercial and industrial lots under the existing by-law.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Every entry is a concise paraphrase of the written minutes. The Jan. 14 workshop has attendance only, and the May 8 Governance minute link is unavailable. Missing records are not evidence of silence.
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS & PROMISED FOLLOW-UPS · 2025
Road infrastructure
Should road modifications be undertaken by the City or the applicant's transportation engineer?
Recorded answer: Planning said the applicant was responsible for water and sewer connections; the minutes do not record a direct answer allocating road-modification responsibility.
Follow-up: Road-modification responsibility was not directly resolved.
Official minutes ↗Operating budget
How many staff positions would receive the collective-agreement-related increase?
Recorded answer: Finance could not give an exact number and said a full complement was 160 to 200 employees depending on casual staffing.
Follow-up: An exact number was not provided.
Official minutes ↗Committee appointments
Were the two absent councillors interested in serving on Governance and Priorities?
Recorded answer: Administration said deferral was council's decision; council deferred the appointments.
Follow-up: Appointments were deferred.
Official minutes ↗Fire capacity
Could council receive the Fire Department Needs Assessment?
Recorded answer: The request is recorded, but delivery is not confirmed in these minutes.
Follow-up: Document delivery was not confirmed.
Official minutes ↗ATCO Loop timeline
When would the concept plan be available?
Recorded answer: Planning expected a development-permit application in approximately seven months, tied to funding.
Follow-up: The target remained conditional.
Official minutes ↗Mixed-use development
What commercial use would occupy the ground floor?
Recorded answer: Planning said no tenant was secured and the proponent sought a non-profit or low-cost commercial tenant.
Follow-up: The tenant remained unknown.
Official minutes ↗Development charges
Were funds budgeted for the City to cover the remaining development charge?
Recorded answer: Planning said development charges fund capital projects and that various sources offset those projects, without identifying a specific budget line.
Follow-up: A specific funding source was not identified in the minutes.
Official minutes ↗Quarry fees
What revenue was expected during the ten-month quarry permit?
Recorded answer: Planning said little extraction remained for the permit period but did not provide a dollar estimate.
Follow-up: No revenue estimate was recorded.
Official minutes ↗Taxi vouchers
Could administration investigate taxi vouchers without printed expiry dates being rejected and print expiry information when applicable?
Recorded answer: Administration said vouchers without a printed date did not expire; Caribou Cabs agreed to continue honouring them and the City said it would issue an update.
Follow-up: A public-information update was promised.
Official minutes ↗Capital budget
Did the colour chart identify multi-year projects?
Recorded answer: Finance said it did not and promised to add a way to identify them.
Follow-up: A multi-year marker was promised.
Official minutes ↗Temporary land use
What assurance prevented the eight-month permit from being extended?
Recorded answer: Planning said any extension would return with other renewal requests and was not guaranteed.
Follow-up: No absolute assurance was recorded.
Official minutes ↗Construction laydown
Would the City retain access to lots for temporary construction laydown?
Recorded answer: Planning said West 40 lots were intended for long-term leases and other temporary areas were being explored.
Follow-up: Alternative temporary laydown locations were still being explored.
Official minutes ↗EDITORIAL SELECTION · REMARKS FROM ACROSS THE 2025 RECORD
Paraphrase
Council members should be more vocal, and construction-related trash and unsightly land rules needed stronger enforcement.
Flaherty linked a media report about councillor visibility with litter on Inuit-owned land and near an Apex construction site.
Official minutes ↗This selected section can include debate and other agenda items; it is not the formal Statements ledger. Remarks are kept separate from the question count. Labels distinguish exact wording, condensed wording and paraphrase.
FORMAL COUNCILLOR STATEMENTS LEDGER
17 written-record entries
Only remarks filed under the regular council agenda’s formal STATEMENTS item. This is separate from debate remarks, questions and the editorial “notable statements” selection above.
INDIVIDUALLY RECORDED POSITIONS · DIVIDED VOTES
Opposed
For
For
Opposed
Motion PD 24-13 · Recommend Astro Hill mixed-use permit with traffic study
Carried · 5–3
Official minutes ↗Opposed
Opposed
For
Motion 24-100 / 24-101 · Cannabis, tobacco and vaping by-law, first and second readings
Both carried · 7–1
Official minutes ↗For
Absent
Opposed
For
Absent
For
Absent
Absent
Motion 25-04 / 25-10 · 2025 Mill Rate By-law, first and second readings
Both carried · 4–3
Official minutes ↗Absent
Absent
Motion 25-27 · Property Tax Exemption By-law, third and final reading
Carried · 3–2
Official minutes ↗For
Absent
Motion PD 25-08 · Acquire vacant federal Upper Base lot for one dollar
Carried · 5–1
Official minutes ↗Opposed
Opposed
For
Opposed
For
Motion 25-207 / 25-210 · Apex NHC land-disposal by-law, first and second readings
Both carried · 3–1
Official minutes ↗Absent
Motion 25-258 · Public Safety Committee restructuring
Defeated · 3–4 after mayor's deciding vote
Official minutes ↗Abstained
Motion 26-75 · Cannabis-establishment zoning, first reading
Carried · 5 for · 1 abstained
Official minutes ↗Opposed
Absent
Abstained
This section does not treat moving or seconding a motion as a vote. Unanimous results without individual names remain collective records. “Absent,” “Conflict,” “Abstained” and “Not in office” are kept separate.
HOW TO READ THIS FILE
Presence, moving a motion, questioning and voting are different records
Attendance reproduces the City’s quarterly grids and separates formal council meetings from committees, hearings and workshops. Motion counts cover 35 written motion records from 2025 and available 2026 registries through August 25. “Substantive” removes agenda and minutes approval, in-camera transitions and adjournment. The question number is a minimum from written minutes; audio may raise it. None of these numbers proves how much work a member did outside the chamber.
For a mayor, council voting is treated separately: the mayor normally votes only to break a tie. Committee participation can create a different voting record.